From "director manages and controls" to the European model: an inevitable transformation

Corporate governance in Ukraine is a field in a state of constant evolution. Over the past 10–15 years, legislation has changed significantly: standards for joint-stock companies, transparency requirements, the institution of independent directors for state-owned companies, and norms on conflicts of interest and information disclosure have appeared.

However, despite the progress, the corporate governance of most Ukrainian businesses is still based on a rather simple model: owner – director – company. And this has certain risks and disadvantages.

How it works in Ukraine

The legal framework defines two main corporate governance bodies:

· the highest body – general meeting of participants/shareholders;

· executive body – a sole director or a collegial body (the board).

The establishment of an additional body – a supervisory board – in Ukraine is mandatory only for public joint-stock companies and state-owned enterprises. For small and medium-sized businesses, it is mostly an optional tool.

Because of this, many companies actually operate in a simplified model: the owner appoints the director, the director makes operational decisions and – often – simultaneously controls themselves. Which, of course, sounds a bit ridiculous. The system of checks and balances is formed only formally.

Fintech Sector: Realities and Limitations

The financial sector requires more sophisticated control mechanisms. The National Bank of Ukraine sets certain requirements for internal control, compliance functions, risk management, and anti-money laundering (AML). However, compared to European standards, our system still remains quite flexible, and sometimes even too flexible.

Subscribe to LIGA PRO to read this article. Go to the full version of the page.