In the context of the growing need for affordable housing, especially for internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other socially vulnerable groups, the authorities face an important strategic question: what is more efficient – reconstruction of existing buildings or new construction? Both approaches have their advantages and limitations. Let's analyze the key aspects of this choice based on international research and practical cases.

Read also
Will the new social housing become "Khrushchev"? Oleg Drozdov on the challenges of architecture and the role of cities

Benefits of reconstruction

1. Economic feasibility

Renovation usually costs 20-50% less than the construction of a new building. This is due to the presence of an already built frame, connection to utility networks, and the availability of urban infrastructure. According to OECD in the report "Brick by Brick" (2021), modernization of existing housing stock is often a more cost-effective solution for creating social housing in cities.

Subscribe to LIGA PRO to read this article. Go to the full version of the page.

Disable ads
Articles published in the "Opinions" section reflect the point of view of the author and may not reflect the position of the LIGA.net editors
vposocial housing